Multimedia: Students’ Adaptive Learning Engagement in Mathematics Classrooms

Authors

  • Addwell Tichafa Chipangura Curtin University
  • Jill Aldridge Curtin University

Abstract

The study reported in this article compared mathematics students in classes that were frequently exposed to multimedia (n=197 students in nine classes) with those that were not (n=168 students in seven classes). First, quantitative data were collected using students’ self-reports on their engagement. Second, classroom observations and interviews with 10 students and six teachers were used to gather information that provided insights regarding the use of multimedia in mathematics classes. The results found statistically significant differences between the two groups, with students who were frequently exposed to multimedia reporting more learning goal orientations, task value, self-efficacy and self-regulation than their counterparts who were not. Further, exposure to multimedia was found to be differentially effective for male and female students. Statistically significant interactions were found between exposure to multimedia and gender for learning goal orientations, task value and self-efficacy with males reporting to be more engaged than females in classes that were frequently exposed to multimedia and less engaged than females in classes that were not frequently exposed to multimedia. The results of this study provide information to practitioners regarding approaches that could be used to improve students’ engagement in mathematics learning.

KEY WORDS: adaptive learning engagement, motivation, multimedia, self-regulation

Author Biographies

Addwell Tichafa Chipangura, Curtin University

School of Education: Science and Mathematics Education Center

Jill Aldridge, Curtin University

School of Education: Science and Mathematics Education Center: Associate Professor

References

ACARA. (2012). Myschool. Retrieved from http://www.myschool.edu.au

Afari, E., Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2012). Effectiveness of using games in tertiary-level mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 1369-1392.

Afari, E., Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B., & Khine, M. S. (2013). Students’ perceptions of the learning environment and attitudes in game-based mathematics classrooms. Learning Environments Research, 16, 131-150.

Alexander, S., & McKenzie, J. (1998). An evaluation of information technology projects for university learning. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

Anderson, A., Hamilton, R. J., & Hatie, J. (2004). Classroom climate and motivated behaviour in secondary schools. Learning Environments Research, 7, 211-225.

Arroyo, I., Woolf, B. P., Burelson, W., Muldner, K., Rai, D., & Tai, M. (2014). A multimedia adaptive tutoring system for mathematics that addresses cognition, metacognition and affect. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(4), 387-426 Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1651859397?accountid=10382.

Attard, C. (2013). "If I had to pick any subject, it wouldn't be maths": Foundations for engagement with mathematics during the middle years. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25, 569 - 587.

Attard, C. (2014). Engagement, technology, and mathematics: Students' perceptions. Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal, 4, 23-33.

Attard, C. (2014a). "I don't like it, I don't love it, but I do it and I don't mind": Introducing a framework for engagement with mathematics. Curriculum Perspectives, 34, 1 - 14.

Australian Education Union. (2008). Policy on gender equity. Southbank: Australian Education Union.

Baanu, T. F., Oyelekan, O. S., & Olorundare, A. S. (2016). Self-efficacy and chemistry students' academic achievement in senior secondary schools in north-central, nigeria. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(1), 43-52. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1826529370?accountid=10382.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148.

Boekaerts, M., & Cascallar, E. (2006). How far have we moved toward the integration of theory and practice in self-regulation? Educational Psychology Review, 18, 199-210.

Bork, A. (1980). New directions for adult and continuing education. Computers in Continuing Education, 5, 79-84.

Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, race and gender in middle school science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7, 271-285.

Chang, M., & Lehman, J. D. (2002). Learning foreign language through an interactive multimedia program: An experimental study on the effects of the relevance component of the ARCS model. CALICO Journal, 20(1), 81-98.

Chapman, D., & Wang, S. (2015). Multimedia instructional tools impact on student motivation and learning strategies in computer applications courses. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 26(2), 129-145.

Cohen, J. (1992). Quantitative methods in psychology: A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.



Cury, F., Elliot, A. J., Da Fonseca, D., & Moller, A. C. (2006). The social-cognitive model of achievement motivation and the 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 666-679.

Dimarakis, N., Bobis, J., Way, J., & Anderson, J. (2014). "I just need to believe in myself more": The mathematical self-belief of year 7 students. In J. Anderson, M. Cavanagh, & A. Prescott (Eds.), Curriculum in focus: Research guided practice (Proceedings of the 37th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) (pp. 183 - 190). Sydney: MERGA.

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.

Florian, L. (2004). Uses of technology that support pupils with special educational needs. In L. Florian, & J. Hegarty (Eds), ICT and special educational needs: A tool for inclusion (pp. 7-20). London, England: Open University Press.

Forgasz, H. J., & Leder, G. C. (1996). Mathematics classrooms, gender and affect. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 8, (1), 153-173.

Forgasz, H., & Rivera, F. (2012). Towards equity in mathematics education: Gender, culture, and diversity. London: Springer Heidelberg.



Gasco, J., & Villarroel, J. (2014). The motivation of secondary school students in mathematical word problem solving. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 12(1), 83-106. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1651833159?accountid=10382.

Helle, L., Laakkonen, E., Tuijula, T., & Vermunt, J. D. (2013). The developmental trajectory of perceived self-regulation, personal interest, and general achievement throughout high school: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 252-267. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12014.

Høigaard, R., Kovac, V. B., Øverby, N. C., & Haugen, T. (2015). Academic self-efficacy mediates the effects of school psychological climate on academic achievement. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(1), 64-74.

Kaplan, A. (2004). Achievement goals and intergroup relations. In P. R. Pintrich, & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in research on motivation and achievement, 13: Motivating students, improving schools: The legacy of Carol Midgley (pp. 97-136). United Kingdom: Elsevier.

Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. (1999). Achievement goals and student well-being. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 330-358.

Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contribution and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 141-187.

Kaplan, A., & Midgley, C. (1997). The effect of achievement goals: Does level of perceived academic competence make a difference? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 415-435.

Lajoie, S. P. (1993). Computer environments as cognitive tools for enhancing learning. In S. Lajoie, & S. J. Derry (Eds), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 261-288). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Lynch, D. J., & Trujillo, H. (2011). Motivational beliefs and learning strategies in organic chemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 1351-1365.

Margolis, J., Fisher, A., & Miller, F. (2000). The anatomy of interest: Women in undergraduate computer science. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 28, 104-127.

Martin, A., Way, J., & Bobis, J. A. (2015). Exploring the ups and downs of mathematics engagement in the middle years. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(2), 199-244.

Mayer, R.E. (2001). Multi-media learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, R.E (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning . New York: Cambridge University Press.



Nardi, E. (2016). Where form and substance meet: Using the narrative approach of re-storying to generate research findings and community rapprochement in (university) mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics , (Special Issue: Mathematics Education and Contemporary Theory). Online First: DOI 10.1007/s10649-015-9643-x.

Neo, M., & Neo, T. K. (2009). Engaging students in multimedia-mediated constructivist learning - Students’ perceptions. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 254-266.

Orlando, J., & Attard, C. (2016). Digital natives come of age: The reality of today's early career teachers using mobile devices to teach mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(1), 107-121.

Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London: The Nuffield Foundation.

Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & Education, 52, 1-12.

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.



Parez, P. M., Costa, J. C., & Corbi, R. G. (2012). An explanatory model of academic achievement based on aptitudes, goal orientations, self concept and learning strategies. The Spanish Journal of Psychnology, 15, 48-60.

Pass, M. W., & Abshire, R. D. (2015). The importance of student effort and relationships with goals orientations and psychological needs. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 19(1), 15-30.

Passey, D., Rogers, C., Machell, J., McHugh, G., & Allaway, D. (2003). The motivational effect of ICT on students. Nottingham: DfES Publications.

Phan, H. P. (2011). A cognitive multimedia environment and its importance: A conceptual model for effective E-learning and development. International Journal on E-Learning, 10(2), 199-221. R.

Phan, H. P. (2014). Expectancy-value and cognitive process outcomes in mathematics learning: A structural equation analysis. Higher Education Research and Development, 33(2), 325-340.

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.



Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667-686.

Prensky, M. (2000). Digital game-based learning. New York: MacGraw-Hill.

Project Tomorrow . (2010). Unleashing the future: Educators “speak up” about the use of emerging technologies for learning. Speak Up 2009 National Findings. Teachers, Aspiring Teachers & Administrators, November 2015. Retrieved from www.tomorrow.org/speakup/

Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R. (2007). Interactive learning environments: Contemporary issues and trends. An introduction to the special issue. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 235-238.

Samson, P. (2010). Deliberate engagement of laptops in large lecture classes to improve attentiveness and engagement. Computers in Education, 20(2), 22-37.

Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2005). Competence beliefs in academic functioning. In A. J. Elliot, & C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 85-104). New York: Guilford Press.

Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2007). Influencing children's self-efficacy and self-regulation of reading and writing through modeling. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23, 7-25.

Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2010). The ROSE project: An overview and key findings. Oslo: University of Oslo.

Skilling, K., Bobis, J., & Martin, A. (2015). The engagement of students with high and low achievement levels in mathematics. In K. Beswick, T. Muir, & J. Wells (Eds.), Proceedings of 39th Psychology of Mathematics Education conference (Vol. 4, pp. 185 -192). Hobart, Australia: PME. Available on-line at http://www.igpme.org.

Squire, K. (2005). Game-based learning: Present and future state of the field. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison Press.

Tall (Eds), D. (2002). Advanced mathematical thinking. New York: Kluwer.

Taylor, L., & Parsons, J. (2011). Improving student engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14, (1), Retrieved November, 2015 from http://cie.asu.edu.

Theobald, M. A. (2006). Increasing student motivation: Strategies for middle and high school teachers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Thompson, B. (2002). “Statistical,” “practical,”and “clinical”: How many kinds of significance do counselors need to consider? Journal of Counseling and Development, 80, 64-71.



Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2003). Changes in the perceived classroom goal structure and pattern of adaptive learning during early adolescence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 524-551.

Velayutham, S., Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2011). Development and validation of an instrument to measure students' motivation and self-regulation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 2159-2179.

Velayutham, S., Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2013). Influence of psychosocial classroom environment on students’ motivation and self-regulation in science learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Research in Science Education, 43, 507-527.

Watt, H. M. (2004). Development of adolescents' self perceptions, values and task perceptions according to gender and domain in 7th through 11th grade Australian students. Child Development, 75, 1556-1574.

Watt, H. M. (2008). Gender and occupational outcomes: An introduction. In H. M. Watt, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Gender and occupational outcomes: Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences (pp. 3-24). Washington, DC: APA books.

Williams, J. B., & Jacobs, J. (2004). Exploring the use of blogs as learning spaces in the higher education sector. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 20(2), 232-247.


Windham, C. (2005). The students perspective. In D. Oblier, & J. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the Net generation (pp. 5.1-5.16). Boulder,CO: EDUCAUSE. Retrieved November 2015 from http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen.

Wolf, S. J., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities. Research in Science Education,38, 321-341.

Wolters, C. A., & Rosenthal, H. (2000). The relation between students' motivational beliefs and their use of motivational regulation strategies. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 801-820.

Yüksel, M., & Geban, Ö. (2016). Examination of science and math course achievements of vocational high school students in the scope of self-efficacy and anxiety. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(1), 88-100.

Zhu, Y., & Leung, F. K. (2011). Motivation and achievement: Is there an East Asian model. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, (5), 1189-1212.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-10